(Un)inflated Expectations: Airless Lunar Wheel Concept Gets a Workout on Moon Rover Prototypes [Slide Show]

A tire company works toward a design for the extremes of space that doesn't need inflating

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A flat tire is nuisance enough for the lucky motorist that has a spare, a jack, and a safe place to pull over. For an astronaut in a bulky spacesuit, exposed to the harsh lunar environment, it could be a mission wrecker—or worse.

That is one of the reasons that designers of tires for lunar rovers both past and future have sought to go airless, and a version now under development by Michelin, in cooperation with NASA, is no exception. Instead of an inflated tire surrounding a rigid wheel, the company designed an integrated lunar wheel with rings of flexible material extending from a hub of metal spokes, a concept based on

Michelin's terrestrial TWEEL. (The military has also explored the development of similar nonpneumatic tires.)

"Pneumatic tires are fine," says Michelin's Bart Thompson, an innovation engineer on the lunar wheel project. "But they have a single-point failure. All you have to do is have a small hole, a microscopic hole, and your structure just becomes inoperable."

But avoiding flats is just one reason for the lunar wheel's design. By eliminating rubber from the equation, the composite lunar wheel should be functional across the vast range of thermal extremes found on the moon, from the freezing nights to the searing heat of the lunar day.

And unlike the metal-weave airless tires on the Apollo moon rovers of the early 1970s, which traversed only a few dozen kilometers each during Apollos 15, 16 and 17, the new generation is designed for far more durability. Michelin is targeting a range of 10,000 kilometers, Thompson says. He adds that the ratio of load carried to wheel mass is more than three times that of the Apollo wheel, meaning the new design strikes a better balance between sturdiness and all-important launch weight.

The lunar wheel was put through its paces in August at the NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland on the Scarab rover, an unmanned prototype developed by Carnegie Mellon University. Scarab is a robotic rover designed as a prospecting and exploration platform, complete with a drill, that could investigate shadowed lunar craters where water may be frozen and other aspects of lunar geology. In the video below, Scarab traverses the test range encumbered by hundreds of kilograms of barbell weights, illustrating how the lunar wheel deforms under heavy loads.

Slide Show: Testing Moon Wheels

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe