Al Gore

U.S. Vice President The former presidential candidate is the preeminent spokesperson on climate change

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It sounds improbable: a documentary film about global warming, starring Vice President Al Gore, has become the third-highest-grossing documentary of all time. After his loss in the 2000 presidential election, Gore began giving a talk on global warming to audiences around the world. An Inconvenient Truth is the film version (also appearing in book form) of his multimedia presentation. Remarkably, its heavy use of PowerPoint slides actually adds to the narrative, which interweaves explanations of climate science with defining episodes from Gore's life to convey a mix of alarm and hope.

The film is a paragon of clear science communication. It explains the workings of complex physical phenomena, such as the jet stream, while chronicling the reality of glaciers receding and the increase in carbon dioxide emissions and global temperatures. Gore, meanwhile, succeeds in bringing the “moral imperative” of reducing greenhouse gases to a personal level, attempting to convince viewers that their own actions can make a difference.

His appeal to individual responsibility is enhanced by the way the former politician, often lampooned for his stiff speaking style, gives the viewer a glimpse of his own life. In one of the film's strongest scenes, Gore recounts how his older sister's death from lung cancer led his family to stop growing tobacco—a painful metaphor for the industrial world's predicament in coming to grips with excess atmospheric carbon.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The film provoked commentary from across the political spectrum. After its release, the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute attacked: “Carbon dioxide—they call it pollution; we call it life.”

But movie critics drew attention to it by generally lavishing praise: “You owe it to yourself to see this film,” urged Roger Ebert. “If you do not, and you have grandchildren, you should explain to them why you decided not to.” The achievement of An Inconvenient Truth has been to bring the most important scientific and technical issue of our time into the public view better than anything before in print or film.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe