New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Alaska’s Northernmost Town Warms So Fast, It Fools NOAA Computers

As sea ice grows shockingly low and late, Utqiaġvik’s record warmth stymies algorithms

melting permafrost

 In this aerial image, lakes created by melting permafrost are seen on June 15, 2017 in Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska.

The Asahi Shimbun Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When federal climate scientists set about making their usual monthly tally of data from weather stations around the country in December, one station was glaringly missing: Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska, the northernmost community in the U.S.

After some digging the scientists found that month upon month of exceptionally warm temperatures had caused their automated quality-control checks to flag the data as suspicious. Basically, the computer algorithm they were using thought the warming over the past year was too rapid to be real.

But it turned out to be very real—and a stark example of the broader warming happening across the Arctic, where temperatures are rising at twice the global average. Through September 30, this year was the Arctic’s second warmest on record (behind only 2016), according to the 2017 Arctic Report Card, released this month by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The unrelenting temperature rise and accompanying downward spiral of sea ice—which in turn amplifies that warming—“confirm that the Arctic shows no sign of returning” to its reliably frozen former state, Jeremy Mathis, director of NOAA’s Arctic Research Program, said at a press conference.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is the connection between sea ice and air temperatures that explains Utqiaġvik’s algorithm-breaking warming. Utqiaġvik sits on a peninsula along Alaska’s North Slope, flanked by the Bering and Chukchi seas, so ocean temperatures influence its climate more than they do in other North Slope locations. The longer the ocean stays ice-free, the more the water’s relative warmth affects Utqiaġvik.

Temperatures at the end of August were 4 degrees Celsius higher than average, and they stayed high through the typical fall freeze-up period. With hardly any sea ice even by the end of November, it is unsurprising that month was the community’s warmest November on record.

Fall temperatures in Utqiaġvik began their dramatic rise when the amount of sea ice there abruptly nose-dived around 2000. Ice levels seen in late November this year were typical of early or mid-October just 15 years ago, says Rick Thoman, climate science and services manager for the National Weather Service Alaska Region. In the 1970s those same ice levels would have been closer to what was typically seen in September, at the tail end of the summer melt season.

To NOAA’s quality-control algorithm—used to catch artificial jumps in temperature caused when weather stations are moved or new sensors introduced—the warming in Utqiaġvik finally reached the point where it was flagged as suspicious. “November was the straw that broke the algorithm’s back,” Thoman says.

The algorithm compares each station in the U.S. to neighboring ones to make sure their trends are similar. But when it comes to Utqiaġvik, the nearest stations are farther away and their temperature rises are not as pronounced. “The bottom line is that [the algorithms] assume gradual change,” Thoman notes. “And what we’ve had in the North Slope of Alaska, and really large parts of coastal Alaska, is really not a gradual change.”

The algorithm has now been fixed to treat Arctic stations differently than those farther south. Abrupt changes in sea ice and temperature could be observed at increasingly southern coastal locations in Alaska, Thoman says, as the Arctic continues to heat up at an unparalleled pace.

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe