Alien World Denser Than Steel Confounds Our Understanding of Planet Formation

A newly spotted world is just perplexingly dense

Artist's representation of a planet with light medium and dark brown stripes.

Pablo Carlos Budassi (composite); ESO/Serge Brunier (background)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A bizarrely dense exoplanet located more than 500 light-years from Earth is challenging scientists' understanding of how planets form. This astronomical body, recently described in Nature, is the size of the ice giant Neptune but nearly 10 times heavier—meaning it is denser than steel.

“It's impossible for a planet like this to have formed by classical planetary formation models,” says lead study author Luca Naponiello, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Named TOI-1853 b, the planet is also oddly close to its sun; it rockets around the star once every 1.24 days. Neptune-size worlds are so rarely found in such tight orbits that astronomers have labeled these planet-sparse zones “hot Neptune deserts.”

The bigger mystery, though, is how TOI-1853 b got so dense. Astronomers think planets usually form “bottom-up,” with grains of rock and dust in a whirling protoplanetary disk glomming on to one another in ever larger clumps, eventually assembling a hefty core. But when that core reaches a certain critical mass, a buildup of pressure in the protoplanetary disk begins pushing additional planet-building material away, stifling further growth. TOI-1853 b seems to have somehow shot right past this limit—it has twice the amount of solid material that researchers believed could accumulate into a single object.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If conventional models can't explain TOI-1853 b, what can? Naponiello and his co-authors propose two possibilities. First, the planet may have emerged from the collision of two preexisting protoplanets. Such collisions are expected in a planetary system's early epochs, but they are more likely to leave behind multiple planets than to result in a single, larger world, Naponiello says.

The second possibility is that TOI-1853 b began as a gas giant about the mass of Jupiter before losing most of its atmosphere to intense stellar radiation, ending up as a stripped-down solid core. Indeed, if this planet once had a sizable atmosphere, very little remains. That makes it unique even among Neptune-size planets, says astronomer Chelsea Huang of Australia's University of Southern Queensland. Huang finds the gas-giant theory particularly intriguing, as such planets' thick atmospheres typically obscure what's happening deeper inside. If TOI-1853 b once was a gas giant, then “this is the only way we can actually observe [a gas giant's] interior,” Huang says.

Future analysis of the planet's remaining atmosphere could reveal whether either of these hypotheses is correct. If TOI-1853 b was formed by collisions, researchers would expect its atmosphere to include water and other volatile compounds. If instead it was once a gas giant, they would expect to see a relatively thin, hydrogen-dominated atmosphere.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe