All Ocean Life Follows This Massive Pattern—Except Where Humans Have Interfered

Humans have shifted the weight of life in the sea

Swirling, colorful ocean textures shot by drone

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Weigh all the creatures that roam the sea, and a striking balance emerges. Researchers have found that the total mass of this life, when grouped in size classes, roughly follows a regular mathematical distribution—although humans may have disrupted part of the pattern.

For a study in Science Advances, researchers combined satellite images, water samples, commercial fishing catch data and computer simulations to estimate the combined weight of all the organisms that move through the open ocean. Next they visualized biomass distribution by placing species on a size spectrum segmented into 23 weight classes. To accommodate the vast size differences, the researchers divided classes using a mathematical function called a logarithm: the average weight of organisms in one class differed by a factor of 10 from adjacent classes. One class contained organisms weighing between 0.01 and 0.1 gram, another between 0.1 gram and 1 gram, and so on.

Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “The Global Ocean Size Spectrum from Bacteria to Whales,” by Ian A. Hatton et al, in Science Advances, Vol. 7; November 10, 2021


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists found that most of the weight classes contain roughly one gigaton of life each. “This could be one of the largest-scale regularities among life on Earth,” says the study’s lead author Ian Hatton, a biologist at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences in Leipzig, Germany.

Exceptions included a few classes containing bacteria, which were overweight because of microbes’ domination of deep waters, and classes containing animals bigger than 10 grams, which had disproportionately little mass. Wondering if humans had contributed to this divergence, Hatton’s team used previously published computer simulations and animal population estimates to reconstruct the ocean size spectrum of the 1850s, before modern industrial fishing. The researchers found that the combined weight of organisms above 10 grams, including whales and many fishes, has decreased by 60 percent since then.

Overfishing is a well-known problem, but this work helps illuminate its extent, says Andrea Bryndum-Buchholz, a marine ecologist at Memorial University in Newfoundland, who was not involved in the study. “It visualizes how we’ve actually changed the ocean fundamentally,” she says.

Nikk Ogasa is a California-based science journalist with a fondness for the environment, Earth and space, and a former editorial intern at Scientific American. Follow Ogasa on Twitter @nikkogasa.

More by Nikk Ogasa
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Weight of Life” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 3 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0322-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe