Alzheimer’s Hits Men and Women Differently, and We Need to Understand Why

To fight the disease, we need to look at sex-specific risks

Cornelia Li

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Growing older may be inevitable, but getting Alzheimer’s disease is not. Although we can’t stop the aging process, which is the biggest risk factor for Alzheimer’s, there are many other factors that can be modified to lower the risk of dementia.

Yet our ability to reduce Alzheimer’s risk and devise new strategies for prevention and treatment is impeded by a lack of knowledge about how and why the disease differs between women and men. There are tantalizing hints in the literature about factors that act differently between the sexes, including hormones and specific genes, and these differences could be important avenues of research. Unfortunately, in my experience, most studies of Alzheimer’s risk combine data for women and men.

For that reason, researchers at the Society for Women’s Health Research Interdisciplinary Network on Alzheimer’s Disease recently published a review paper in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association that calls for greater analysis of research data by sex to stimulate new approaches that will improve prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have some evidence, for example, that sex hormones such as estrogen influence the course of the disease, but we do not understand enough about why and how. Ovaries are the primary source of estrogen for premenopausal women, and surgical removal of a woman’s ovaries before menopause is associated with a higher risk of dementia. But using estrogen therapy after surgery until age 50 negates that risk. This fact suggests that estrogen may be protective in premenopausal women.

In men, there are conflicting studies as to whether androgen-deprivation therapy, which is used to treat prostate cancer, increases the risk for Alzheimer’s. Further investigation is needed into the role of sex hormones, the use of different hormonal treatments and the ways they each impact Alzheimer’s risk.

Among risk factors that affect both women and men, some are more common in one sex. For example, depression and sleep apnea are both risk factors for dementia, but depression is twice as common in women, and sleep apnea is much more common in men. Similarly, low education and poor job attainment are Alzheimer’s risk factors, but traditionally women have not had the same access to education and job opportunities as men, which puts them at increased risk.

The e4 allele of the APOE gene is the strongest and most common genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s in both women and men, but it confers a greater risk in women. Women with APOE e4 are at increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s, compared with women without the allele and men with and without it.

Learning how sex impacts risk factors at various times across a life span is also critical. For example, in cardiovascular disease, taking aspirin helps to reduce heart attack and stroke risk in women aged 65 years and older. This effect is not seen in younger women. It is possible that certain Alzheimer’s risk factors may be strongest at certain points during our lives, and exploring this correlation is key for prevention and early intervention.

Risk factors are just one of the areas in which we need more research into the differences between the sexes in Alzheimer’s. Scientists have often overlooked sex differences in diagnosis, clinical trial design, treatment outcomes and caregiving. This bias has impeded progress in detection and care.

Approaches that incorporate sex differences into research have advanced innovation in respect to many diseases. We need to do the same in Alzheimer’s. Looking at these differences will greatly enhance our understanding of this thief of minds and improve health outlooks for all.

Rebecca Nebel is director of scientific programs at the Society for Women's Health Research, a national nonprofit organization.

More by Rebecca Nebel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 319 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Why Sex Matters in Alzheimer's” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 319 No. 3 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0918-11

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe