Ambidexterity and ADHD: Are They Linked?

People whose brains are too symmetrical are at risk for cognitive problems

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of the first things that anatomy students learn is that the brain is divided down the center. In most people, one half, or hemisphere, plays a dominant role. Handedness has long been a crude measure of hemispheric dominance, because each side of the brain controls the opposite side of the body. Right-handers, for instance, are likely to have dominant left hemispheres. Today researchers are realizing that studying ambidextrous children (who have no dominant hand) could yield insights into the consequences of an unusually symmetrical brain.

A team of European researchers recently assessed nearly 8,000 Finnish children and showed that mixed-handed children are at increased risk for linguistic, scholastic and attention-related difficulties. At age eight, mixed-handed kids were about twice as likely to have language and academic difficulties as their peers. By the time the children were 16, they also were twice as likely to have symptoms of ADHD—and their symptoms were more severe than those of right- or left-handed students.

Ambidexterity is not causing these problems. Rather “handedness is really a very crude measure of how the brain is working,” says Alina Rodriguez, a clinical psychologist at King’s College London and the study’s lead author. In typical brains, language is rooted in the left hemisphere, and net­works that control attention are anchored in the right—but brains without a dominant hemisphere may be working and communicating differently.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Consistent with this theory, a 2008 study by scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles, found anomalies in cross-hemisphere communication in children with ADHD. On tasks that should be the domain of the left hemisphere—such as linguistic processing—children with ADHD seemed to be getting too much input from their right hemispheres. Rodriguez is quick to point out, however, that mixed handedness does not, by itself, indicate a malfunctioning brain and is “just one risk factor among many others.”

So why do some kids have overly symmetrical brains? The answer may lie in epigenetics—the mechanism by which environmental influences affect gene expression. In 2008 Rodriguez found that women who experienced stressful life events or depression during pregnancy were more likely to give birth to children who became mixed handed, adding evidence to the idea that the experiences of a mom-to-be affect her fetus’s brain development. [For more about prenatal influences on mental health, see “Infected with Insanity,” by Melinda Wenner; Scientific American Mind, April/May 2008.] That means that handedness, Rodriguez says, “can be used with other markers to predict who’s going to have problems with behavior” and give parents, teachers and doctors the opportunity to intervene at the first sign of trouble.

SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Ambidexterity and ADHD: Are They Linked?” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 3 (), p. 7
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0710-7a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe