New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Amphibians Suffering Unprecedented Decline, Global Study Finds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The first worldwide assessment of amphibians--the group that includes frogs, toads, salamanders and caecilians--concludes that they are in even more trouble than mammals and birds are. The study classifies nearly a third of the 5,743 known amphibian species as threatened. And another quarter might be if scientists knew more about them. In many cases, the researchers could not explain the threat in terms of known causes, such as habitat destruction or hunting.

Five hundred and twenty scientists in more than 60 countries contributed to the Global Amphibian Assessment, coordinated by IUCN, Conservation International and NatureServe. Regional experts decided whether each species was "vulnerable," "endangered" or "critically endangered." The IUCN Red List of threatened species defines these categories using such criteria as population size, population decrease and species range reduction. A report published online yesterday by Science summarizes the results.

In all, 32 percent of amphibian species fell into one of these groups, which are collectively referred to as "threatened." By contrast, about a quarter of mammal species and one eighth of bird species are threatened. An additional 1,294 amphibian species were too poorly understood to classify. The study further determined that at least 2,468 amphibian species are in decline, 435 are worse off than they were in 1980 and as many as 122 have disappeared altogether since then. "There's never been a decline [and] extinction phenomenon in human history that's been like this," says team leader Simon Stuart of the IUCN.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Only about half of the rapid declines could be attributed to habitat reduction, human exploitation or both. Some of the remaining so-called enigmatic declines happened even in such well protected areas as Yosemite National Park in California. "Clearly there's something different going on here," Stuart asserts. One possible factor is a fungal disease called chytridiomycosis, which is particularly prevalent in the mountainous streams where most of the enigmatic declines occurred. Until the causes are better understood, Stuart notes, hundreds of amphibian species are at risk of extinction unless scientists buy time by raising them in captivity.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe