New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

An Algorithm That Can Spot When People Lie to the Police  

The tool has already helped detect fake reports leading to the detention of several suspects across Spain 

Polygraph machines also attempt to spot lies.

Allan Swart Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spain's National Police Corps recently welcomed a new member: an artificial-intelligence tool called VeriPol. It is the first text-based system for ferreting out phony robbery reports—and it is astoundingly accurate, researchers say.

When Miguel Camacho Collados worked as a police inspector in Granada several years ago, he became frustrated at how often his team had to deal with robbery complaints that turned out to be fake. “Many colleagues were wasting a lot of time investigating cases that had never occurred,” says Camacho Collados, now at Spain's Ministry of Interior in Madrid. “It was a problem.”

People fake robberies for various reasons. Some simply want to avoid telling family or friends they lost something valuable—but others do it to cash in on insurance claims, Camacho Collados says. Until recently, the only strategy for catching them was asking seasoned police officers to review suspicious reports, but this approach was not always effective. So Camacho Collados, who is also a trained mathematician, and other scientists designed an algorithm-based system that picks out false reports by scrutinizing the wording of statements.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team trained VeriPol on a total of 1,122 robbery reports the national police had closed—meaning either the thief had been convicted or the complainant had confessed to fabricating the crime. It then tested how accurately the algorithm classified a sample of 659 reports as true or false, compared with two human experts. VeriPol outperformed the cops by 15 and 20 percent, respectively. The results, published in June 2018 in Knowledge-Based Systems, have also helped researchers understand how people lie to the police. Fabricated reports, for example, tend to describe a specific modus operandi (the attacker usually wears a helmet or attacks from behind). They also use shorter sentences and lack information about the actual incident.

VeriPol is already being successfully deployed across Spain. A June 2017 pilot test in the cities of Murcia and Málaga helped to detect 25 and 39 false robberies in just one week—compared with only three and 12, respectively, for that month in the previous decade.

William Wang, a computer scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who was not involved in the research, thinks VeriPol's success could be replicated in other countries—particularly where police departments are short-staffed. Camacho Collados hopes VeriPol will also be used to spot other often-staged crimes, such as home burglary or car theft. For now, he says, the message is clear: “People are going to think more than once before filing a fake report.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe