New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Brain Changes Decades before Dementia Sets In

Chemical changes in the brain predate Alzheimer's by decades in some patients

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A preventive treatment for Alzheimer’s disease is one of medicine’s holy grails. Until recently, however, testing such a regimen would have been impossible—people do not have symptoms of dementia until it is too late. Now the Dominantly Inherited Alzhei­mer Network project, a large international study of those whose families suffer from a heritable form of early-onset Alzheimer’s, has found that those who develop the disease have chemical changes in their brain decades before symptoms appear. Although the genetic form of the disease is rare, the discovery of these early chemical signals gives scientists a much needed group of people they can use to test potential deterrents. If a drug works on them, it would probably help the rest of the population, explained scientists at the International Conference on Alzheimer’s in Paris this past July. [For more on these families and the quest to prevent Alzheimer’s, see “Decoding Dementia,” by Joel Shurkin; Scientific American Mind, November/December 2009.]

Joel Shurkin has written nine books on science and the history of science. He has taught science writing at Stanford University, the University of Alaska and the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Joel Shurkin
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 6This article was published with the title “An Early Warning Sign” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 6 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0112-13b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe