Brain Changes Decades before Dementia Sets In

Chemical changes in the brain predate Alzheimer's by decades in some patients

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A preventive treatment for Alzheimer’s disease is one of medicine’s holy grails. Until recently, however, testing such a regimen would have been impossible—people do not have symptoms of dementia until it is too late. Now the Dominantly Inherited Alzhei­mer Network project, a large international study of those whose families suffer from a heritable form of early-onset Alzheimer’s, has found that those who develop the disease have chemical changes in their brain decades before symptoms appear. Although the genetic form of the disease is rare, the discovery of these early chemical signals gives scientists a much needed group of people they can use to test potential deterrents. If a drug works on them, it would probably help the rest of the population, explained scientists at the International Conference on Alzheimer’s in Paris this past July. [For more on these families and the quest to prevent Alzheimer’s, see “Decoding Dementia,” by Joel Shurkin; Scientific American Mind, November/December 2009.]

Joel Shurkin has written nine books on science and the history of science. He has taught science writing at Stanford University, the University of Alaska and the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Joel Shurkin
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 6This article was published with the title “An Early Warning Sign” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 6 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0112-13b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe