New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Anatomical Abnormalities in the Brain May Contribute to Stuttering

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Stuttering may result at least in part from anatomical abnormalities in the brain, according to a new study published in today's issue of Neurology. For a long time, scientists presumed that emotional factors caused Persistent Developmental Stuttering (PDS), but a team of researchers, led by Anne Foundas of Tulane University, has discovered interesting patterns that suggest otherwise in the brains of PDS patients.

The scientists took MRI brain scans of 32 people and discovered that the right and left temporal lobe were significantly larger in the 16 test subjects who had PDS. To determine whether men or women--or righties or lefties--were more prone to PDS, the team chose 12 right-handed PDS patients (three women and nine men) and four left-handed men--a combination that approximates the distribution of PDS patients in the general population.

They concluded that the two factors are correlated with several anatomical features: the Pars Triangularis, for example, was considerably larger in left-handed patients than in right-handed ones. And the Pars Triangularis and Pars Opercularis were larger in men than in women. According to the researchers, their study shows that physical anomalies in the speech-language areas of the brain make people more likely to develop a stutter.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe