Anatomical Abnormalities in the Brain May Contribute to Stuttering

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Stuttering may result at least in part from anatomical abnormalities in the brain, according to a new study published in today's issue of Neurology. For a long time, scientists presumed that emotional factors caused Persistent Developmental Stuttering (PDS), but a team of researchers, led by Anne Foundas of Tulane University, has discovered interesting patterns that suggest otherwise in the brains of PDS patients.

The scientists took MRI brain scans of 32 people and discovered that the right and left temporal lobe were significantly larger in the 16 test subjects who had PDS. To determine whether men or women--or righties or lefties--were more prone to PDS, the team chose 12 right-handed PDS patients (three women and nine men) and four left-handed men--a combination that approximates the distribution of PDS patients in the general population.

They concluded that the two factors are correlated with several anatomical features: the Pars Triangularis, for example, was considerably larger in left-handed patients than in right-handed ones. And the Pars Triangularis and Pars Opercularis were larger in men than in women. According to the researchers, their study shows that physical anomalies in the speech-language areas of the brain make people more likely to develop a stutter.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe