Ancestor of Animals Breathes Nitrogen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The earth is full of locales seemingly inhospitable to life. In areas like that deep beneath the ocean's mud floor, oxygen cannot penetrate. In such anoxic environments, the simple cellular precursors of all life--bacteria and archea--thrive, but the single-celled ancestors of more complex life-forms, known as eukaryotes, were thought to suffocate. Now new research has shown that at least one eukaryotic species--a shelled, amoebalike creature called a foraminifer--can prosper without oxygen by respiring nitrogen instead.

Marine ecologist Nils Risgaard-Petersen of the National Environmental Research Institute in Silkeborg, Denmark, and his team investigated the flora in a sediment core from Gullmar Fjord, Sweden. Deep into the mud, the researchers found a pool of nitrate that seemed to correlate with foraminifera abundance. This foraminifer--Globobulimina pseudospinescens--also contained nitrate concentrations at least 500-fold higher than the surrounding sludge. A second sediment core collected in Chile's Concepcion Bay confirmed that foraminifera were hoarding nitrate.

Accumulating nitrate requires energy and therefore is unlikely to be undertaken unless it benefits the organism in some way. Archaea and bacteria benefit by breathing the stuff in the surrounding mud, turning nitrate into dinitrogen gas and getting rid of their organic waste in the process, a chemical reaction known as denitrification. In the lab, G. pseudospinescens consistently respired the nitrate, and close examination of the eukaryote's makeup showed that it did not contain any bacteria that could assist in this process. Rather, the organism used its own cellular machinery to control the process, storing as much as a month's worth of nitrate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The finding marks the first time that more complex animals have been proved to play a role in denitrification, a crucial part of the nitrogen cycle, and have shown an ability to proliferate in anoxic environments. G. pseudospinescens likely acquired the trick because nitrate is a nontoxic ion and can be safely stored as the organism plunges into deeper strata. (In contrast, stored oxygen, because it is so reactive, can wreak internal havoc in such microbes.) And it is probably not alone; two other species of foraminifera found in the Chilean sediment showed nitrate concentrations "up to 15,000-fold higher than the maximum porewater concentration," the researchers write in the paper presenting the finding in today's Nature.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe