New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Ancestor of Animals Breathes Nitrogen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The earth is full of locales seemingly inhospitable to life. In areas like that deep beneath the ocean's mud floor, oxygen cannot penetrate. In such anoxic environments, the simple cellular precursors of all life--bacteria and archea--thrive, but the single-celled ancestors of more complex life-forms, known as eukaryotes, were thought to suffocate. Now new research has shown that at least one eukaryotic species--a shelled, amoebalike creature called a foraminifer--can prosper without oxygen by respiring nitrogen instead.

Marine ecologist Nils Risgaard-Petersen of the National Environmental Research Institute in Silkeborg, Denmark, and his team investigated the flora in a sediment core from Gullmar Fjord, Sweden. Deep into the mud, the researchers found a pool of nitrate that seemed to correlate with foraminifera abundance. This foraminifer--Globobulimina pseudospinescens--also contained nitrate concentrations at least 500-fold higher than the surrounding sludge. A second sediment core collected in Chile's Concepcion Bay confirmed that foraminifera were hoarding nitrate.

Accumulating nitrate requires energy and therefore is unlikely to be undertaken unless it benefits the organism in some way. Archaea and bacteria benefit by breathing the stuff in the surrounding mud, turning nitrate into dinitrogen gas and getting rid of their organic waste in the process, a chemical reaction known as denitrification. In the lab, G. pseudospinescens consistently respired the nitrate, and close examination of the eukaryote's makeup showed that it did not contain any bacteria that could assist in this process. Rather, the organism used its own cellular machinery to control the process, storing as much as a month's worth of nitrate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The finding marks the first time that more complex animals have been proved to play a role in denitrification, a crucial part of the nitrogen cycle, and have shown an ability to proliferate in anoxic environments. G. pseudospinescens likely acquired the trick because nitrate is a nontoxic ion and can be safely stored as the organism plunges into deeper strata. (In contrast, stored oxygen, because it is so reactive, can wreak internal havoc in such microbes.) And it is probably not alone; two other species of foraminifera found in the Chilean sediment showed nitrate concentrations "up to 15,000-fold higher than the maximum porewater concentration," the researchers write in the paper presenting the finding in today's Nature.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe