Ancient Engravings Push Back Origin of Abstract Thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ¿SCIENCE

For all the attributes that humans share with other animals, there is a trait that clearly sets us apart: our reliance on symbolism. Exactly where and when in our lineage this and other aspects of modern human behavior emerged, however, have proved difficult to pinpoint. The fossil record indicates that anatomically modern humans had evolved by 100,000 years ago. Yet clear and abundant evidence for behavioral modernity only appears after 40,000 years ago. Now new findings may help to close that gap. According to a report published online today by the journal Science, excavations at a South African cave site have turned up two pieces of ochre bearing symbolic engravings that date back about 77,000 years to the so-called Middle Stone Age (MSA).

Ochre, a form of iron ore, appears relatively frequently among the scraps of culture left behind by our Stone Age predecessors, who may have used it to tan hides or to paint with. But the newly discovered pieces bear unequivocal signs of use as symbolic objects. Christopher S. Henshilwood of the Iziko Museums of Cape Town and his colleagues report that both specimens bear cross-hatched markings that appear to have been produced through a deliberate sequence of choices.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The Blombos Cave motifs suggest arbitrary conventions unrelated to reality-based cognition ... and they may have been constructed with symbolic intent, the meaning of which is now unknown" the authors. note. "These finds demonstrate that ochre use in the MSA was not exclusively utilitarian and arguably, the transmission and sharing of the meaning of the engravings relied on fully syntactical language." Given that evidence of abstract thought is the only criterion scholars seem to agree on when it comes to identifying modern behavior in the archaeological record, the team writes, "it seems that, at least in southern Africa, Homo sapiens was behaviorally modern about 77,000 years ago."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe