New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Ancient Forests May Protect Birds from Rising Heat

Old-growth forests tend to have moderate temperatures compared to their surroundings, which could potentially provide heat-sensitive birds a refuge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Old-growth forests can provide a refuge for heat-sensitive birds as temperatures rise across the Pacific Northwest, according to new research.

Ancient forests tend to provide moderate temperatures compared with their surroundings, potentially buffering some of the sharpest impacts of climate change, said Matthew Betts, a professor at Oregon State University.

With that knowledge, Betts and a team of researchers set off to see if the birds that breed in the canopies of these old groves benefit from their surroundings.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists began by pulling data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey—a 52-year-old avian monitoring program that tracks hundreds of bird species across the U.S. and Canada.

Each June, more than 2,500 volunteers take to the forests to identify birds. They traverse 25-mile-long survey routes, stopping every half-mile for three minutes to count birds that are seen or heard in a quarter-mile radius. The survey, which is managed by the U.S. Geological Survey, is one of the most comprehensive long-term data sets on bird populations in North America.

Betts and his team selected 13 species often spotted in old-growth forests across Oregon, Washington and California, and they analyzed how the populations have changed over the past 30 years.

On paper, most of the species have weathered the warming trends so far. They found just two species, the Wilson's warbler and the hermit warbler, whose populations have declined as temperatures have climbed. That's because warming and precipitation changes can affect insects, the main food source of many bird species, Betts said.

Climate change is having an uneven effect on the Pacific Northwest. Some areas are warming, others are cooling, and it's happening at different rates. When the researchers overlaid data from the breeding bird survey with satellite imagery that showed the distribution of old-growth forest across the region, they found a surprising result.

"It turned out if the landscape is warmed and had old growth on it, populations tended to not be declining of these two bird species," Betts said.

On the other hand, if the landscape contained less than 20 percent old-growth forest and temperatures were up, warblers there suffered greatly.

Betts stressed these findings are correlative; no experiment was conducted. Still, he said it provides insight into how bird populations are responding to a changing climate. He and some colleagues hope to dive into why these forests seems to buffer certain bird species from the impacts of climate change. They're planning future experiments at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest located in the western Cascade Range.

They already have some theories. One reason old-growth forests might be cooler could be tied to tree size. Many of the ancient giants boast trunk sizes of 6-8 feet in diameter, and they may suck up lots of heat and keep it trapped. Another reason could be that verdant old-growth forests have more layers of canopy, which intercepts sunlight.

Betts conceded it may be that birds flock to these ecosystems for other reasons despite below-average temperatures.

Birds are pretty smart, he said, despite the old adage "bird brain."

"There are so many more nooks and crannies, cavities in the trees and shady parts in the branches ... you could have them do what we would do on a hot day, naturally buffer themselves," he said.

The study was published in the journal Diversity and Distributions.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe