New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Ancient Scrolls, Burned in Vesuvius Volcano Eruption, Deciphered by Advanced X-Ray Scans

Writings thought lost in the explosion that buried Pompeii can be read with a technique related to CT scanning

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists in Italy have managed to decipher text on a badly scorched papyrus roll from Herculaneum, a town destroyed with Pompeii in the Mount Vesuvius eruption of 79AD. The imaging technique they used may allow archaeologists to analyse other texts previously thought to be too badly damaged to read.

Hundreds of carbonised papyrus rolls were excavated from the ‘Villa of the Papyri’ in Herculaneum in 1754, said to contain the only surviving library from antiquity. Many of the texts were later stored in the National Library of Naples and several were given to Napoléon Bonaparte as a gift in 1802.

‘The scrolls are a very well-known and important resource for specialists because we’ve lost most of the texts from antiquity,’ says study author Vito Mocella, from the National Research Council’s Institute of Microelectronics and Microsystems in Italy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mocella and his colleagues were keen to read the text within the contorted layers of this burned papyrus roll but didn’t want to unroll it, as this would irreversibly damage the artefact. The team thought that x-ray computed tomography (XCT) might provide the solution to this problem. This is because XCT can build up a 3D overview of the inside of the specimen by using x-rays to generate a cross-sectional stack of 2D images that can be then be combined.

Mocella points out, however, that this basic principle was not enough to generate the contrast needed to image the ink against the burned papyrus. ‘XCT cannot distinguish between materials that are very similar from a chemical point of view,’ he explains. ‘In antiquity, the inks were essentially carbon-based and the papyri [under investigation] have been carbonised.’ This chemical similarity means that both the ink and papyrus absorb x-rays at similar levels and the words are lost.

The team managed to get around this problem by using x-ray phase contrast tomography (XPCT). This modified form of XCT does not rely on differing levels of absorption but on how the x-ray is refracted through each of the different materials to generate the high contrast needed. Once the papyrus is in position, it is rotated through 360° as the x-ray beam scans across it and the emitted x-rays are collected to produce the 3D image.

Upon exposing the scroll, Mocella and his colleagues were able to image several letters of the Greek alphabet through the dense layers of ancient paper. The clear contrast also allowed the group to compare the style of writing from the damaged scroll to another salvaged papyrus to determine the specimen’s age and author. It is most likely that part of the text was from the hand of Philodemus, a philosopher who based his works on the teaching of Epicurus. Mocella says that in time it should be possible to read a 'significant part of the text' and that it's all a question of improving current data analysis techniques.

Graham Davis, a specialist in x-ray microtomography from the Queen Mary University of London, UK, believes the work is a ‘major step forward’. ‘It’s obviously early days but it has answered a fundamental question,’ Davis tells Chemistry World. ‘The real question was whether there was a method of retrieving text that was written with carbon ink and here’s the answer.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on January 20, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe