New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Ancient seafarers helped shape Arctic ecosystems

Humans might have been sailing the sea between Greenland and Canada as long as it’s been unfrozen, archaeological evidence suggests

A view out to sea from the rocky shores of the Kitsissut island cluster, which lies over 50 kilometers from the northwest coast of Greenland.

Crossing over 50 kilometers between Kitsissut and shores of northwest Greenland is difficult today, but even ancient seafarers were able to repeatedly make the journey.

Matthew Walls et al.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the pristine High Arctic sits the Kitsissut island cluster, also known as the Carey Islands, nestled between northwest Greenland and northeast Canada. The surrounding seas are perilous, and traveling there is difficult even with modern boats. But new archaeological evidence suggests ancient humans managed to sail to the islands, too.

Early settlers lived on the islands between 4,500 and 2,700 years ago. Archaeologists had long assumed they were land-bound, unable to cross the seas surrounding them after the ice that once blanketed the area had melted. But new research published Sunday in the journal Antiquity suggests these settlers formed seafaring communities that existed for at least as long as the area’s polynya—a technical name for unfrozen water amid sea ice—indicating that humans have long had a hand in shaping the dynamic Arctic ecosystem.

“We saw a space for archaeology to bring forward the deep history of the environment and learn more about stewardship through time,” says the study’s lead author, Matthew Walls, an archaeologist at the University of Calgary.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the past, archaeologists had assumed humans made their way to the Arctic by following musk oxen and other onshore prey. But though more recent evidence has suggested otherwise, it’s been hard to dispel the old theory, particularly because remnants of boats and fishing supplies—made from organic materials—were largely missing from the archaeological record.

The new study helps fill in some of those gaps. The researchers analyzed 297 archaeological features and artifacts from five localities, primarily on Isbjørne Island in the Kitsissut island chain. The dwellings they found there indicate that humans regularly visited and inhabited the islands, traveling from one to the other and back.

“You’re looking at a trip that’s maybe 15 to 18 hours of difficult paddling and in this environment where things can change on you very quickly,” Walls says. “I think the people who were able to make this trip had an incredible amount of navigational skill and ability.”

The findings reveal the Arctic settlers’ seafaring nature and deep understanding of the waters around them. They also show that humans played a big role in a vibrant ecosystem that emerged after a massive chunk of sea ice unfroze approximately 4,500 years ago—around the same time humans started journeying across it. Every species that has made the area the ecological hotspot it is today—from seabirds and polar bears to seals and toothed whales—would have had some degree of contact with these early human settlers.

The intertwined history of the ecosystem could help inform future conservation efforts, says Sofia Ribeiro, a researcher at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, who was not involved in the study.

“[The study] will be a good contribution to inform measures for the future,” Ribeiro says.“We need to be looking at stewardship as something that has been happening that is not isolated from the evolution of this ecosystem.”

Walls hopes the work will inform regional officials’ decision-making about environmental stewardship and inspire further study of the region’s lesser-known historical inhabitants.

“I think we’re at a moment where an important platform for archaeology is to help better represent environmental histories that account for cultural stories as well,” Walls says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe