Ancient Shells May Be Earliest Jewels

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These days, diamonds are a girl¿s best friend. But more than 70,000 years ago it seems that tick shells were the jewelry of choice. Researchers report today in the journal Science the discovery of the oldest known decorative beads. According to team leader Christopher Henshilwood of the University of Bergen in Norway, the find "provides important new evidence for early symbolically organized behavior in Africa."

The international team of researchers uncovered 41 shell beads, which date to 75,000 years ago, in Blombos Cave in South Africa. The pea-size shells (see image) seem to have been selected based on their dimensions, the team reports, and were deliberately perforated. What is more, because the creatures from which they came (Nassarius kraussianus) are waterborne and the cave is located 20 kilometers from surrounding estuaries, Middle Stone Age humans had to deliberately transport them. The shells were clustered in groups of up to 17 and the scientists suggest that each grouping could have come from a different jewelry item. They also detected traces of red ochre, a widely-used pigment at the time, on many of the spheres.

A number of previous discoveries indicate that humans began to rely on symbolism about 40,000 years ago. But the new finds, together with two pieces of engraved ochre from the same South African cave recovered last year, suggest that this ability may have developed much sooner. Some questions remain--such as just how the holes were made in the shells--but recovering more relics from the time period should help scientists better understand our Stone Age predecessors. Notes Henshilwood, "Once symbolically mediated behavior was adopted by our ancestors it meant communication strategies rapidly shifted, leading to the transmission of individual and widely shared cultural values--traits that typify our own behavior."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe