Ancient Star Sheds Light on Chemical Composition of Early Universe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers have spotted in the southern Milky Way a stellar relic hailing from the dawn of time. The 14- to 15-billion-year-old star, described today in the journal Nature, is providing key insights into how elements formed in the early universe.

Conventional wisdom holds that the first stars were born of the hydrogen and helium present in the early universe. They themselves then began forging 'metals' (elements heavier than helium) such as carbon, phosphorous and lead. When these first-generation stars eventually reached the end of their life cycle, they exploded as supernovae, scattering their metallic contents across the universe, so the story goes. But despite decades of searching for stars to verify that scenario, researchers had only turned up representatives containing too much metal to be relevant.

The new star, however, "is the closest astronomers have come to having direct knowledge of the elemental composition of the universe shortly after the Big Bang," study co-author Timothy C. Beers of Michigan State University remarks. Unlike previously found stars, which contained around 1/10,000 of the metal in our Sun, the newly discovered star has just 1/200,000 of our Sun's metal. "This is perhaps the first identification of a true second-generation star," Beers remarks. Its low metal content, he adds, "is evidence of the previous generation of massive stars that exploded as supernovae."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Still mysterious, however, is why scientists haven't found any intermediately metal-rich stars. To that end, Indiana University astronomer Catherine A. Pilachowski writes in a commentary accompanying the Nature report, "Only time, and the extension of new surveys to even fainter stars, will tell."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe