Ancient Tartar Shows Our Ancestors Ate Bark

Ancient tartar shows our ancestors ate bark and some other surprising foods

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A recent scientific discovery had researchers buzzing about, of all things, tartar. That's right, the crusty deposits that the dentist scrapes off your teeth when you go for a cleaning. Except in this case, it was the tartar on the teeth of the nearly two-million-year-old Australopithecus sediba, which has been held up as a candidate ancestor for our genus, Homo. No one had ever before found tartar in an early hominin (a creature on the line leading to humans, after the split from the line leading to chimpanzees). And in analyzing the ancient tartar, the researchers had recovered evidence of what A. sediba ate. It wasn't at all what they expected.

In a paper published in July in Nature, Amanda Henry of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, Lee Berger of the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and their colleagues report on tartar, tooth chemistry and wear-mark analyses conducted on an adult female and a subadult male found at a site just outside Johannesburg. Their tooth chemistry indicated that over their lifetime they dined mostly on trees and shrubs (or, possibly, animals that ate those foods). This is surprising because other hominins of similar antiquity relied more heavily on tropical grasses and sedges.

The tartar analysis yielded traces of plant foods no one thought our ancient kin ate, such as bark. Berger notes that many primates use bark as a fallback food during times when fruit is hard to come by. He has speculated that the


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


hominins, whose remains were recovered from what was once a deep underground cave, may have ended up there because drought conditions drove them to try to access a pool of water inside. The bark finding could bolster that scenario.

Conventional wisdom holds that Homo adapted to changing environmental conditions that favored the spread of grasslands by incorporating meat into its diet. A. sediba has small teeth, which are associated with an increase in higher-quality foods such as meat, and dexterous hands that may have been capable of making tools. So did A. sediba eat meat? With the “type of data we are getting, I think we will reach answers to these questions,” Berger says.

COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/sep2012

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Tooth Sleuths” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 3 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0912-28a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe