Anemic Phytoplankton

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A long-standing puzzle in ocean photosynthesis was why phytoplankton failed to grow fast in parts of the Pacific Ocean; after all, the microscopic plants have access to plenty of carbon dioxide thanks to upwelling water. Lack of iron is the answer, marine scientists conclude. Photosynthesis is reduced among phytoplankton in water with poor iron concentrations as compared with those in iron-rich conditions, even though phytoplankton in both conditions make the same amount of chlorophyll. “When these little ocean plants are starved for iron, they produce more chlorophyll than they need,” says lead researcher Michael Behrenfeld of Oregon State University. That way, if environmental changes cause iron levels to rise, they can then take advantage of the increase immediately. Prior studies relied on satellite images, which measure chlorophyll levels alone, so they would not have revealed this distinction. The iron deprivation means that estimates of global ocean carbon uptake are probably 2 to 4 percent too high, the group reports in the August 31 Nature.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Anemic Phytoplankton” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 5 (), p. 37
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1106-37b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe