Annual Report of the President of the Western Union Telegraph Company

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In some respects, this is a remarkable document. This Company have a capital stock of $41,063,100, including sinking fund, amounting to $494,800, which, deducted from the otal capital stock, leaves a of $40,568,300, on which a dividend was paid last July. The net profits of the year ending July 1, 1869, were $2,801,457'48, less than seven per cent on this capital. During three years, from the commencement of 1866, the net profits of the company have been $8,015,432'06. Out of these profits, $4,134,879'10 have been expended in the construction of new lines, purchase of telegraph property, redemption of bonds, purchase of real estate, interest on bonds, sinking fund, and miscellaneous expenditures, leaving a balance for dividends of $4,044,595'34. No one will be disposed to think these profits too large ; but we have no- doubt that the profits on all telegraph property in the United States might be made much larger by a general and large reduction of tariff. The present rates,while they do not afford the companies, on an average, seven per cent interest on the capital invested,—many of the smaller companies netting far less than this,—are still so high that the telegraph is not, as it ought to be, a rival to the postal system, in the transmission of messages. Until such a consummation can be approximated, large profits on telegraph property cannot be expected. Another obstacle to progress has been, want of uniformity in the tariff of charges in different sections of the country. On this head, the Report under consideration gives us information, not only as to the cause of non-uniformity, but the influences which tend to perpetuate it. It says : "This peculiarity was the result of the great number of separate organizations,having tariffs upon various bases,which required adding together at the termini of two or more lines, so t.t, upon a dispatch, which was transmitted a few hundred miles, two or three rates were sometimes charged. For instance, a few years since, there were five telegraph companies owning the lines c nnecting Portland, Maine,with Cleveland, Ohio, and the tariff between these two places was ascertained by the addition of the local rates from Portland to Boston, Boston to Springfield, Springfield to Albany, Albany to Buffalo, and from Buffalo to Cleveland. The same system prevailed throigl out the United States until after the consol-dation of the lines made it possible to transmit messages between places thousands of miles apart without the necessity of booking or re-checking at intermediate points. This result nect ssitated a remodeling of the tariffs, and the work has

Scientific American Magazine Vol 21 Issue 16This article was published with the title “Annual Report of the President of the Western Union Telegraph Company” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 21 No. 16 (), p. 251
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10161869-251

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe