Antarctic Glacier Has Retreated 3 Miles in 22 Years

Sitting atop a deep canyon, Denman Glacier could be a weak point in the Antarctic Ice Sheet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have identified another Antarctic glacier that could be more vulnerable to climate change than previously suspected.

Denman Glacier in East Antarctica has largely flown under the radar until now. Much of the focus at the South Pole has centered on rapidly melting glaciers in West Antarctica, where the rate of ice loss is the highest.

The enormous Thwaites Glacier, for instance—which is currently pouring around 50 billion tons of ice into the ocean each year—is the subject of an ongoing, multiyear international research project spearheaded by U.S. and British science agencies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There’s been increased focus on East Antarctica, though, as recent mapping projects have revealed that the region may not be as stable as scientists previously suspected. And Denman Glacier may be a major point of vulnerability, a new study suggests.

The research, led by glacier expert Virginia Brancato of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, suggests that Denman has retreated by about 3 miles over the last 22 years. It’s lost around 268 billion tons of ice in that time.

What’s more, the authors note, Denman rests on top of a unique, steeply sloping terrain. It’s just the kind of setup that could lead to faster and faster ice loss if the glacier continues to melt—potentially resulting in irreversible retreat.

That could be a threat to people living in coastal areas all over the world. If Denman were to collapse, it could raise global sea levels by nearly 5 feet.

Denman Glacier first came into the public focus a few months ago, when a new mapping project revealed surprising insight about the bedrock beneath it. The glacier rests atop an enormous chasm more than 2 miles deep. It’s the deepest land-based canyon on Earth.

The study published this week in Geophysical Research Letters expands on that finding.

Relying mainly on satellite data, the researchers observed changes in the glacier’s “grounding line” over time—that’s the point where the ice physically connects to the bedrock before it juts into the sea. As a glacier melts and destabilizes, pouring ice into the ocean, its grounding line tends to slide farther inland.

The study revealed that Denman’s ice loss has been accelerating since the 1970s. The part of the glacier that’s melting fastest—the ice shelf, or the part that juts into the ocean—is losing close to 150 feet of ice a year.

A melt rate that high could probably only be caused by unusually warm ocean water, the researchers said, with temperatures at least a few degrees above freezing. Recent measurements around this part of Antarctica have suggested that this is, indeed, the case.

What’s likely happening is that these warm waters are seeping beneath the ice shelf and helping to melt the glacier from the bottom up. Scientists have observed the same process in parts of rapidly melting West Antarctica.

At Denman it poses a greater danger than in other places. The ground beneath Denman has an unusually steep slope. And on the western side of the glacier, in particular, it’s not broken up by ridges or other physical characteristics that might stop the ice from sliding backward.

As a result, the glacier may have an above-average risk of unstoppable retreat once the ice really gets moving.

That risk likely depends on how far the warm water manages to creep beneath the glacier and how quickly the glacier melts in response, the researchers said. And that’s a question they haven’t answered yet. The new study reveals how much ice Denman is losing but not exactly how the water is interacting with the ice or how those interactions might change in the future.

But the study does flag Denman as a previously overlooked threat to global sea-level rise—one that should be closely monitored in the coming years. And it reaffirms scientists’ growing perspective that East Antarctica is more vulnerable than they used to believe.

“We conclude that the potential exists for a rapid retreat along the Denman trough in the future,” the researchers write. “These observations challenge the view of glacier stability in East Antarctica.”

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Chelsea Harvey covers climate science for Climatewire. She tracks the big questions being asked by researchers and explains what's known, and what needs to be, about global temperatures. Chelsea began writing about climate science in 2014. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Popular Science, Men's Journal and others.

More by Chelsea Harvey

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe