New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Antarctic Survey Shows Widespread Glacial Retreat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The most comprehensive survey yet completed of glaciers in the Antarctic has discovered widespread movement, especially in the past five years. The findings, published today in the journal Science, indicate that the rate of sea-level rise could increase if ice shelves in the area continue their retreat.

Scientists with the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) analyzed data collected from studies of 244 marine glaciers on the Antarctic Peninsula over the past 50 years. More than 2,000 aerial photos and 1,000 satellite images helped the researchers reconstruct the behavior of glacier-ice shelves and tidewater glaciers. They found that 87 percent of the glaciers have retreated over the study period by about 600 meters, on average. Over the same time period, the atmospheric temperatures in the region increased by 2.5 degrees Celsius. Such dramatic and localized warming is certainly playing a role in the changes, says the study's lead author Alison Cook of the BAS, but it is not the only factor that caused the changes. "It's a complex picture," she notes.

The retreat has occurred at a discontinuous rate over the past half century. According to the report, the past five years have seen the quickest recoil, with glaciers moving back about 50 meters annually, faster than any other time period since 1955. There were some exceptions, however, as 32 glaciers showed modest advancements. Says study co-author David Vaughan of BAS, "this is the kind of exploration of Antarctica you could never do on site."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe