Antarctica Gives Astronomers Best View of the Stars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Going to the ends of the earth may be as good a strategy for observing the heavens as sending telescopes into space is. Findings published today in the journal Nature indicate that the middle of an Antarctic plateau is the best place to situate a telescope--images taken there can approach the quality of those taken by the Hubble Space Telescope at a fraction of the cost.

Ground-based telescopes are hampered by our planet's atmosphere, which causes light coming from stars to waver. Scientists describe the ¿seeing¿ of a potential telescope site by how much light jittering occurs, which in turn affects the sharpness of the images that can be taken. Michael C. B. Ashley of the University of New South Wales in Australia and his colleagues tested seeing conditions at a site in Antarctica called Dome C, which is located at 75 degrees South Latitude and at an elevation 400 meters higher than the South Pole is. Previous tests at the South Pole had indicated that seeing at the South Pole Station is nearly twice as bad as it is at mid-latitude telescope locations. The researchers determined that conditions at Dome C, however, are two to three times clearer than those experienced at central observatories. ¿This implies a factor of 10 increase in sensitivity,¿ Ashley says. ¿Put another way, an eight-meter telescope on the Antarctic Plateau could achieve the sensitivity limits of a hypothetical 25-meter telescope anywhere else.¿

Dome C's high elevation, flat surrounding terrain, low wind speeds, and extreme temperatures and humidity contribute to the excellent conditions, the scientists report. The team concludes that Dome C is the best ground-based site to develop a new astronomical observatory and that telescopes positioned there ¿could work on projects that would otherwise require a space mission.¿

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American