Anthracite Coal Centennial

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Appropriate celebration of the centennial of anthracite coal is being considered by the citizens of the town of Plymouth, Pa. In 1807 the first shipment of the "black stone" was made by boat down the Susquehanna River, from Plymouth to Columbia, Pa. This date marks the beginning of the use of anthracite, which, according to records of the United States Geological Survey, was discovered about 1790, but was burned only by the use of blowers and forced draft before 1807. It was the discovery that anthracite must be freed from every impurity and crushed to a uniform size before it could be successfully burned, which started the great industry that this year will probably have an output of 70,000,000 tons. People had become accustomed to burning soft coal, which contained so much gas that lumps of any size could be readily ignited and burned without difficulty. Few would have predicted that, unlike soft coal, which is sent to market as it comes from the mine, hard coal would require preparation for market almost as complicated as the manufacture of flour from wheat. The actual mining of anthracite is only the beginning of a long series of processes which produce the accurately sized pure coal which is so satisfactorily burned to-day in millions of homes and in heating plants of large buildings which must have smokeless chimneys. As it comes from the mines anthracite varies in size from lumps as large as a watermelon to those as small as a walnut. The large lumps are individually examined on benches, by men who are expert in detecting layers of black slate or other impurities which look much like coal and which are unavoidably mined with it. With small axes the lumps are cracked, and every vestige of unburnable material is removed before the coal is passed on to be crushed and sorted, by passing over moving screens, into the numerous sizes ready for loading on the cars. Lumps too small to be separately inspected on the start, are crushed first and screened into uniform sizes, after which boys pick out all the impurities r.s the coal passes slowly in thin layers down long chutes. In some localities considerable dirt adheres to the coal, and in addition to the crushing and sizing it is necessary to subject it to several washings during preparation so that it will be clean and bright and all impurities can be readily seen and removed.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 97 Issue 26This article was published with the title “Anthracite Coal Centennial” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 97 No. 26 (), p. 471
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12281907-471

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe