Beam Bagged: "Reverse Laser" Functions as Near-Perfect Light Absorber

Physicists have constructed a sort of anti-laser, a silicon device that turns very specific kinds of light into energy


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Since they were invented 50 years ago, lasers have become extraordinarily commonplace. Anyone with a few dollars to spare can get themselves a laser pointer, and every CD, DVD or Blu-ray player uses a laser to read the bits encoded on discs. (It goes without saying that the same is true of those old LaserDisc players.) Just about everyone knows how lasers work, at least on the most superficial level—a concentrated beam of light comes out when energy goes in.

But what if that same process could be run in reverse, like a movie run backward? Last year, a group of physicists at Yale University proposed a way to do just that with something called a time-reversed laser. Such a device, which some have described with the 007-appropriate "anti-laser," completely swallows light to produce heat or electricity using an optical cavity that absorbs rather than amplifies light. In other words, energy comes out when light goes in. Now the same researchers, along with two other Yale colleagues, have actually managed to build an anti-laser, which absorbs more than 99 percent of the light striking it and converts it to thermal energy. They reported the advance in the February 18 issue of Science.

But the anti-laser does not work for any old light source; the absorption is specific to narrow frequencies of so-called coherent light—light whose waves are synchronized—which is what an ordinary laser emits. (Put another way, the technology does not make for more efficient solar cells that could absorb all of the sun's full-spectrum energy.)

The device sprang from a theoretical inquiry into how lasers of all kinds work, and then how they would work under the condition that physicists call time reversal. "I was saying to colleagues, imagine it the other way around," recalls Yale theoretical physicist Douglas Stone, a co-author of the new study. "You illuminate it with exactly the same light that the laser would emit, and everything would be absorbed at that frequency." Then, Stone says, came the key question: "Wait a second. Could we really do that?"

Partnering with a group of Yale experimentalists led by Hui Cao, the researchers figured out how such an anti-laser might work. By splitting a laser beam and aiming each part onto opposite sides of a polished silicon wafer, the group engineered a system of reflection and interference that traps both beams in the silicon. Unable to escape, they are absorbed and their energy dissipates as heat, and Stone says that with proper engineering electrical output is also possible. Less than 1 percent of the light escapes in the demonstration device; with better lasers, the researchers say, even greater absorption should be possible.

Making the beams interfere perfectly so that the silicon wafer traps them both is tricky business, a recipe that requires precisely controlling the two beams' traits. Splitting a single laser beam ensures that both sides of the silicon wafer are illuminated by light with the same wavelength and amplitude, and a delay along one of the beam paths controls the relative phase of the beams—whether waves of the two beams are in step or out of sync. With the right phase shift a material that would ordinarily reflect (like a mirror) or transmit (like a window) more than a third of the incident light suddenly absorbs nearly all of the laser light striking it. "When you get to that special condition, it gets in and bang—it can't get out," Stone says.

A different phase shift does just the opposite, reducing the absorption of the material. In other words, a change to one of the laser beams affects how both beams interact and how much light gets through. "This is really light controlling light," Stone says. "It's a light-controlled switch, and that's pretty new." That switching could be useful for optical circuits, which use light rather than electricity to carry information.

The physical properties of the material help determine which wavelengths of light will be perfectly absorbed; for the initial silicon device the sweet spot is in the near infrared. But Cao says that similar devices could be concocted using the same recipe for visible wavelengths. "If we design our structure correctly, we can do it," she says. "We can adjust the parameters to make this happen at the visible range."

The fact that the anti-laser's absorption is so sensitive to light's properties limits its usefulness as a collector of raw solar energy but could be useful, for instance, in singling out very specific spectral signals. "The simplest thing I can imagine is a detector that is tuned to detect radiation in a noisy environment where there are many frequencies," says Princeton University theoretical physicist Hakan Türeci.

Stefano Longhi, a physicist at the Polytechnic Institute of Milan, says that the research could lead to any number of possible optical wonders. "The experiment is very clean, very impressive," he says. "And one can imagine even more amazing things." One possibility is a material that goes from being transparent to being a perfect absorber, simply by changing the interference pattern of the light that strikes it. Or one could envision a material that can be a spontaneous emitter of light or perfect absorber—both a laser and an anti-laser in one. "This is the first step toward such fascinating interactions of matter and light," Longhi says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe