Apple's Steve Jobs: "Hormone Imbalance" Has Caused Health Problems

Computer executive posts statement to quell questions on his condition

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Apple co-founder and chief executive Steve Jobs posted an open letter to customers on his company's Web site today in which he says that he's being treated for an unspecified "hormone imbalance" that has caused severe weight loss and kept him out of the public eye. Jobs's letter is short on details, making it difficult to figure out the actual disorder that he's battling, says Robert Lustig, professor of clinical pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco. "There are three medical threads that run through the [letter], but unfortunately they don't form a strong cable," he says.

In the letter, addressed to the "Apple Community," Jobs, who is not scheduled to address the MacWorld conference in San Francisco this week as he has done regularly since returning to the company in 1997, says that "a hormone imbalance has been robbing me of the proteins my body needs to be healthy." Jobs, who was reportedly successfully treated for early-stage pancreatic cancer in 2004, notes that the "remedy for this nutritional problem is relatively simple and straightforward," but does not spell out what it is.

Lustig says it is unclear what type of illness might cause this protein deficiency, because it is unknown whether Jobs cannot properly absorb and process proteins or whether his body has stopped making them. In addition, he says, a hormonal imbalance would suggest that there's a problem with his endocrine system (ductless hormone-producing glands—including the pancreas, thyroid and pituitary—that control reproductive capabilities and metabolism as well as bodily growth and development), although endocrine disorders are not generally considered to be "nutritional problems".

Jobs's reference to a "hormone imbalance" in the letter alone is too vague and general to diagnose, agrees Bruce White, a cell biology professor at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington. But he says that if Jobs has a hormone imbalance that is affecting the amount of proteins in his body, it points to a possible problem with production of the hormone insulin (by the pancreas) and the possible onset of type 1 diabetes (which is rare but not unheard of in adults).

"The main regulator of protein synthesis is insulin," White says. "If he's not producing sufficient insulin, [his body] would have trouble transporting amino acids [the building blocks of protein] into his cells."

Jobs's battle with pancreatic cancer (he had an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor removed in 2004 and has since been in remission) adds another piece to the puzzle. If the tumor that Jobs had removed in 2004 had begun to break down prior to the surgery, White says, the tumor's dead cells could have released protease and lipase enzymes that may have damaged beta cells in the pancreas, which produce insulin. But he stresses that it is impossible to accurately diagnose Jobs's condition without more details.

Steve Dowling, an Apple spokesperson, said that the letter is all that the company plans to release on the Apple chief's condition. Speculation has swirled about Jobs's health since he announced last month that he would not appear MacWorld, which is running through January 9. The official reason given for Jobs's absence was that the company is preparing "to wind down its participation in MacWorld," according to the Washington Post.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe