Apple's R&D spending hits a low

Guess what Apple's research and development spending is as a percentage of revenue? Chances are your answers are so far off that Apple's R&D spending could be a drinking game.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Guess what Apple's research and development spending is as a percentage of revenue?

Chances are your answers are so far off that Apple's R&D spending could be a drinking game.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you ask a few friends you're likely to get guesses anywhere from 4 percent to maybe 10 percent or so. The real answer: R&D represents 2.2 percent of sales.

The point is worth pondering as Apple preps its fiscal fourth-quarter earnings tomorrow. For the nine months ended June 25, Apple's R&D spending was $1.78 billion, or 2.2 percent of sales.

And we scream that Hewlett-Packard isn't innovative for spending 3 percent of sales on R&D spending.

Apple's figures, which were found doing some research, highlights how Apple's R&D spending has been sliding as a percentage of revenue for years. Granted, Apple's revenue has been growing so quickly that it would be nearly impossible to keep up its R&D spending as a percentage of revenue without just throwing money away, but the spending levels are notable.

Note that Apple's R&D spending is increasing, but not at a pace to keep up with its skyrocketing revenue. In fiscal 2000, Apple's revenue reached $7.98 billion. This fiscal year, it's expected to hit $109 billion.

For comparison's sake, here are R&D figures from related tech giants:

• HTC spends 3.83 percent of revenue on R&D as of June 30, down from 5.23 percent for the same period a year ago. • Microsoft spent 13 percent of revenue for fiscal 2011, down from 14 percent in fiscal 2010. • Dell spent 1 percent of revenue on R&D for fiscal 2011. • Google spent 14 percent of revenue on R&D for the nine months ended September 30. • IBM has spent 6 percent of revenue on R&D for years. • For the nine months ended July 31, HP spent 2.5 percent of revenue on R&D.

Here's a look at Apple's trend:

• Today: R&D is 2.2 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2010 R&D spend: 2.7 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2009 R&D spend: 3.1 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2008 R&D spend: 3.4 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2007 R&D spend: 3.3 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2006 R&D spend: 3.7 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2005 R&D spend: 4 percent of revenue (restated). • Fiscal 2004 R&D spend: 4 percent of revenue (restated). • Fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001 R&D spend: 8 percent of revenue. • Fiscal 2000 R&D spend: 5 percent of revenue.

The larger question here is what is Apple doing to wring so much return out of its R&D spending. A few thoughts:

• Apple may have a relatively small product team. • Apple doesn't engage in fundamental research like an IBM would. • The company is focused on software and industrial design where the innovation may not require a lot of R&D spending.

In any case, Apple's R&D spend as a percentage of revenue is worth watching going forward. The company obviously stepped up its R&D game in the early part of the last decade and is harvesting the returns in 2011.

Related Links: Chrome could unseat Firefox as No. 2 browser 91 percent of kids are gamers, research says Facebook global revenue expected to hit $4.27B Apple tops in customer satisfaction for 8th year A translation of Apple's iPhone event invite

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe