Arctic Krill Track Day and Night Even in Polar Darkness

Without the sun’s guiding light, these tiny animals’ behavior still follows a circadian rhythm

Arctic krill.

Arctic krill.

Jonathan Cohen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

During Arctic winter, the sun disappears below the horizon for long weeks of “polar night.” But new research shows that tiny crustaceans in the Arctic Ocean somehow maintain their daily rhythms during these extended periods of darkness.

Most living creatures use sunlight to time their biological processes and behaviors. This becomes a challenge when there is effectively no sunrise or sunset—and even more so under the sea, where water dims what little light there is. But small, shrimplike animals known as Arctic krill, an important food source for many aquatic species, have developed a crafty adaptation to maintain their habits during the polar night. Even underwater they can detect extremely subtle changes in light from the sky as the sun shifts position below the horizon, researchers report in PLOS Biology.

“Biological clocks are how our bodies anticipate what’s going to happen next, like how we know to start getting hungry around lunchtime,” says University of Delaware marine biologist Jonathan Cohen, lead author on the new study. Krill behavior shows that the polar night has enough light to keep this biological timer ticking in some creatures.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cohen and his colleagues studied the krill species Thysanoessa inermis in the laboratory and in its natural Arctic Ocean habitats off the Svalbard archipelago. They found not only that krill could detect minimal shifts in very scant light but that the electrical activity in their eyes heightened at night, suggesting increased light sensitivity. Moreover, the crustaceans were using the faint light variations to coordinate their movements through the water column, gliding to the surface to search for food in the darkest times and retreating to the depths during the “brighter” hours to evade predators. So far scientists know of only a few other animals, including flies and mice, that can tune biological clocks with such low levels of light, Cohen says.

The researchers are still unsure why krill continue swimming up and down during the very darkest nights. “If there’s no light, there’s no primary production and algal blooms—so there’s nothing for them to eat,” says Emma Cavan, a marine biologist at Imperial College London who was not involved in the study. “So why are they moving to the surface? It’s one of the big mysteries of vertical migrations.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe