Arsenic-Catching Chemicals May Clean Drinking Water

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) greatly reduces the amount of arsenic allowed in drinking water, a regulation that is currently under consideration, the public will benefit from the higher standard. Indeed, ingesting high levels of arsenic is linked to various cancers and other illnesses. But depending on how low they set the limit, the EPA's decision could come with a multibillion-dollar price tag. New arsenic-trapping materials developed by researchers at Sandia National Laboratories, however, may help to reduce that cost.

To create arsenic-catching chemicals, the Sandia developers first selected mineral families known to attract negatively charged atom groups, or anions, such as the arsenic-containing compound arsenate. They then employed supercomputer modeling to rapidly assess the arsenic-trapping potential of thousands of variations and combinations of these minerals. The simulations revealed a selection of promising materials¿dubbed specific anion nanoengineered sorbents (SANS). The team is now confirming the potential of SANS in the lab, sending arsenic-contaminated water through them and measuring the amount of arsenic in the outflow.

Next the researchers hope to test the materials at a planned city water purification plant in Albuquerque, N.M., as well as in smaller water systems in rural communities. "Municipalities now filter out dirt, silt and sewage," team member Pat Brady remarks, "but pulling out stuff at the parts-per-billion range cheaply is a new and difficult challenge."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe