Artificial Method of Producing Sapphires

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some time since, says the Mining Magazine, M. Gaudin obtained artificial rubies by fusing ammoniacal alum before the oxy-hydrogen blow-pipe, with the addition of a small quantity of chromate of potash. It is now said that he has succeeded in preparing perfectly isolated and colorless crystals of alumina, in the form of the sapphire. For this purpose he introduces into a crucible lined with charcoal equal weights of alum and sulphate of potash, both previously refined and reduced to a powder, and exposes the crucible for a quarter of an hour to the full heat of the forge. When the crucible is broken, the crevices of the lining are found to contain a mass consisting of sulphuret of potassium, through which are disseminated the crystals of alumina. The mass is treated with aqua regia, and the crystals left in the form of a fine sand, which is well washed with water. The crystals vary in size according to the mass* of ma terials employed, and the duration of the heat. Those obtained by M. Gaudin, operating on a small scale, were about one millimetre (0-0394 inches) in length. They are colorless, because in this process any metallic oxyds which may be added for the purpose of imitating the natural colors ofpv'4jphires are reduced by the charcoal. T.%, tremely limpid, and surpass the natural ruD) in hardness. The formation of such cr'rjlu_ depends on the solvent actjp1 ret of potassium.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 43This article was published with the title “Artificial Method of Producing Sapphires” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 43 (), p. 337
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07031858-337d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe