Artificial Proteins Assembled from Scratch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Proteins are vital components of every cell. They activate genes, enable motion, catalyze biochemical reactions--the list goes on. Biotechnologists are thus understandably eager to unravel their every secret: only with a thorough comprehension of natural proteins can they engineer novel ones with special properties.

Findings published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences represent intriguing progress on that front. Current efforts to construct new proteins follow two approaches. In the first, scientists painstakingly design strings of the protein building-blocks known as amino acids according to the atomic interactions of the entire molecule. In the second, amino acids are randomly thrown together in all manner of combinations, the logic being that given enough combinations, a promising new protein should result sooner or later.

Michael H. Hecht of Princeton University and his colleagues, the authors of the new report, have developed a tactic that seems to wed the best of both worlds. By imposing a few rules on the so-called combinatorial libraries of amino acid sequences--rules favoring sequences bearing the basic structure of natural proteins--the researchers have been able to eliminate a number of the hopeless molecules from the outset. Specifically, they produced focused libraries of artificial sequences by dictating the pattern of water-loving and water-fearing amino acids--but not the exact identities of the amino acids--so as to encourage proper, protein-like folding while fostering the creation of novel combinations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To test the viability of the approach, the team analyzed one of the resulting "de novo proteins," S-824. With the help of a spectrometer, the investigators determined that S-824 had among other things just the sort of water-loving surface and water-fearing core characteristic of natural proteins.

Such designer proteins could one day deliver drugs to ailing cells, form the basis of "smart" materials, or serve as superior catalysts. The process outlined by Hecht and his collaborators could streamline the search for man-made molecules up to those lofty tasks.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe