Asbestos Action

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Breathing in asbestos and silica has long been known to cause lung damage, but how the damage occurs has been a mystery. Using mice, scientists have now zeroed in on a key player known as the Nalp3 inflammasome, a complex of proteins that serves as a potent alarm system in our bodies. Evidently, when the body breaks down inhaled asbestos fibers, it ultimately produces reactive oxygen that triggers the inflammasome, which in turn causes lung inflammation. Mice that lack the Nalp3 inflammasome have a reduced reaction to asbestos. According to study co-author Jürg Tschopp of the University of Lausanne in Switzerland, the finding suggests that people exposed to asbestos should be checked for inflammation of the lung, which may be apparent 10 years after exposure. Also, because Nalp3 lies behind other immune reaction conditions, such as gout, the team speculates that gout medicine might slow the progression of inflammatory lung disease. Science published the results online April 10.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Asbestos Action” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 6 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0608-36b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe