Ask the Experts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

How can Bayes' theorem assign a probability to the existence of God?

Chris Wiggins, an associate professor of applied mathematics at Columbia University, offers this explanation:

In the 18th century Reverend Thomas Bayes first expressed the probability of any event—given that a related event has occurred—as a function of the probabilities of the two events independently and the probability of both events together.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Take the following example. A patient goes to see a doctor for a checkup. The doctor knows a test he performs has 99 percent reliability—that is, 99 percent of sick people test positive, and 99 percent of healthy people test negative. The doctor also knows that only 1 percent of the population is sick. Now the question is: If the patient tests positive, what are the chances the patient is sick? The intuitive answer is 99 percent, but the correct answer is actually 50 percent. Bayes' theorem relates the probability of being sick given a positive test result, p(s|+), to the probability of receiving a positive test result given that one is sick, p(+|s), and to the general probability of being sick, p(s), and the general probability of getting a positive result, p(+). (Calculating the last probability is left to the reader.) Bayes' theorem in this case would read p(s|+) = p(+|s) × p(s) / p(+).

The importance of accurate data in quantitative modeling is central to the subject raised here: using Bayes' theorem to calculate the probability of the existence of God. (Bayes, for his part, never related his theorem to the subject.) Scientific discussion of religion is a popular topic at present, with several recent books arguing against theism. In one, The God Delusion (Houghton Mifflin, 2006), University of Oxford professor Richard Dawkins argues specifically against the use of Bayes' theorem for assigning a probability to God's existence.

Dawkins takes exception to this usage not because he doubts the veracity of Bayes' theorem but because turning human experience into numbers is, he argues, an inherently subjective process. A Bayesian approach to evaluating the likelihood of God's existence involves enumerating possible outcomes (the presence of good, evil, religious revelations, and so on) and determining their probabilities assuming the existence or nonexistence of God. One must also express the prior belief of God's existence—the probability we would assign to the existence of God if we had no data from our experiences. Dawkins notes that these figures cannot be determined quantitatively, rendering Bayes' theorem useless in this enterprise. In applications for which data are available, however, Bayes' theorem lies at the heart of almost all statistical modeling and is a critical tool for thinking concretely about uncertainty.

How do certain hairs know to grow back when you trim them?

—C. Spain, New York City

George Cotsarelis, a University of Pennsylvania dermatologist and specialist in hair and scalp disorders, replies:

Clipping hairs on the surface of the skin does not affect their growth, because the hair above the surface is dead.

The hair visible on our bodies grows out of living hair follicles within the skin. All these follicles go through the so-called hair follicle cycle, which has three stages: growth, degeneration and rest—called anagen, catagen and telogen, respectively. During anagen, the rapid proliferation of cells at a follicle's base, or bulb, results in the constant production of a hair fiber that emerges from the skin surface. (Follicles produce hairs of different lengths by staying in anagen for varying periods.) At the end of anagen, these hair-producing cells begin to die, entering into the catagen stage. After dying back for a few weeks, the follicle rests for several weeks or even months in telogen. A new lower hair follicle then regenerates from stem cells in the telogen follicle, and anagen begins anew. The old hair fiber then falls out—often while you are brushing your hair—as a new strand replaces it. The hairs that appear to “know” to grow back after being trimmed just happen to be in the anagen stage when you cut them.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Ask the Experts” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 4 (), p. 108
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0407-108

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe