Ask the Experts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Why does my cell phone screech when it is near my computer?

David Grier, chair of the physics department at New York University, dials up some possible answers to this mystery:

It sounds like a case of electromagnetic interference, or EMI: radio waves emitted by one device causing undesirable behavior in another. Virtually every piece of electrically powered equipment acts as a radio transmitter, whether it is supposed to or not; the changing electric currents running through these devices naturally radiate electromagnetic waves. This radiation is an inevitable by-product of harnessing electricity to do useful things, analogous to the clanking and clattering of traditional mechanical devices. Computers are particularly “noisy” because they rely on rapidly changing currents to act as clock signals that coordinate their calculations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One possible explanation is that your computer unintentionally emits radio waves in the range of frequencies reserved for cell phone communications, typically around 800 megahertz (millions of cycles per second). If the signal coming from your computer were strong enough, your phone could mistake it for a cell phone transmission—albeit an indecipherable one.

Another possibility involves a deeper connection between your two devices. Just as changing currents generate radio waves, radio waves induce electric currents in conducting materials—which is how a metallic antenna allows a radio to detect signals transmitted by radio stations. The radio waves emitted by your computer may induce currents in the amplifier that drives your cell phone's speaker, which would cause it to produce random squeaks and squawks. (In 1975 computer pioneer Steve Dompier cleverly commandeered this effect, with more tuneful results: he programmed his PC, a MITS Altair 8800, so that its EMI would play the Beatles' “The Fool on the Hill”

There is no way to stop electrical devices from generating radio waves, but keeping spurious waves under wraps will curb EMI. Most electronic devices are housed in cases—either made of metal or coated with a conductor—that trap these electromagnetic waves, but holes in the cases and thin spots in the coating allow some waves to escape. Usually the leakage is so small that it just affects objects very near the source, which is why your cell phone only acts up right next to your computer.

How does the weight of CO2 released in combustion exceed the weight of the fuel burned? And by how much?—B. Easley, Jackson, Miss.

Susan Trumbore, chair of the earth system science department at the University of California, Irvine, replies:

Carbon fuels generally exist in reduced form—that is, the carbon atoms are attached mostly to hydrogen atoms. During combustion, the carbon becomes oxidized (combined with oxygen from the air) to make carbon dioxide (CO2). Because oxygen is far heavier than hydrogen, the product is heavier than what is burned.

Take gasoline, for example. One of its primary components, octane, is a molecule made up of eight carbon atoms and 18 hydrogen atoms. The weight of one mole (6.02 × 10

23 units) of octane molecules is equal to the weights of eight carbon atoms (at 12 grams per mole each) plus 18 hydrogen atoms (at one gram per mole each). Octane therefore weighs 114 (8 × 12 + 1 × 18) grams per mole.

The weight of CO2 is 44 grams per mole (1 × 12 grams per mole for the carbon and 2 × 16 grams per mole for the oxygen). If all the octane combusts to carbon dioxide, each of its eight carbon atoms becomes part of a CO2 molecule, yielding eight CO2 molecules per octane molecule burned—or eight moles of CO2 per mole of octane burned. Combusting one mole of octane, therefore, would produce 352 (8 × 44) grams of CO2.

Thus, the weight ratio of CO2 produced to octane burned is 352 to 114, or roughly 3 to 1. Actual ratios will vary, however, because gasoline is not purely octane.

HAVE A QUESTION?... Send it toexperts@SciAm.comor go to www.SciAm.com/asktheexperts

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Ask the Experts” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 5 (), p. 108
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0508-108

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe