Assisted Suicide Leaves Many Physicians Uncertain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The legalization of assisted suicide in Oregon has not made physicians' lives any easier. Many, in fact, remain uncertain, according to a new study published in today's issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). The Death with Dignity Act, passed in 1994 and enacted in 1997, lets doctors prescribe a lethal dose of medication for terminally ill patients who are mentally competent to choose to commmit suicide. The patients then administer the medication themselves.

But a survey of 2,641 doctors authorized to prescribe such medication revealed that many are grappling with both professional and ethical issues related to the new responsibility. Many reported referring more terminally ill patients to hospices; the number rose from 22 percent in 1994 to 30 percent. And among those willing to make life or death decisions, an alarming number were unsure of their own assessments: "Of the 73 physicians who were willing to write a lethal prescription and who had received a request from a patient, 20 (27 percent) were not confident they could determine when a patient had less than six months to live," the researchers write.

Seven percent of the survey participants also said that some clients became upset upon learning their physician's stance on assisted suicide¿and two percent had lost patients as a result. Of interest, more patients left their doctors because he or she opposed assisted suicide. "A large portion of physicians, despite not being morally opposed to assisted suicide, have practical concerns about participating in the Death with Dignity Act and only a minority are willing to provide a lethal prescription to a qualified patient," the authors conclude. "Some physicians who are willing to assist in legalized suicide may lack knowledge necessary to evaluate patients' eligibility."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe