Asteroids Could Have Caused Flash Floods on Young Mars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Space missions to Mars in the 1970s first brought back the surprising news that the Red Planet had once been awash in water. Ever since then, scientists have been working to determine the source of the flowing water that left telltale tracks on Mars's surface. Now findings published in the current issue of the journal Science suggest that collisions with comets and asteroids during the planet's early years may have played a role.

Teresa Segura of the University of Colorado and her colleagues used a mathematical model to investigate the potential relationship between markings on the Red Planet that indicate the presence of water and those created by collisions with asteroids and comets. "The river valleys and large craters of Mars may both be about the same age geologically," Segura explains. "We think that the two must be related, and our paper describes one possible connection." Specifically, the researchers modeled the impact of 25 bodies between 100 and 250 kilometers in diameter that bombarded the planet around four billion years ago. According to the team's calculations, the impact of even the smallest asteroid would deliver an amount of energy equivalent to millions of megatons of TNT to the planet. This influx of energy, the team posits, could have melted nearly three meters of polar ice and injected up to 16 meters of water into the atmosphere. Torrential rainfall--two meters a year--would have ensued.

These periods of rain, the scientists say, lasted from months to decades. "This happened dozens of times, maybe more, but after it rained, Mars would go dry," study co-author Kevin Zahnle of NASA's Ames Research Center comments. This hypothesis does not bode well for the existence of life on the Red Planet. The authors conclude that "only during the brief years or decades after the impact events would Mars have been temperate, and only then might it have bloomed with life as we know it."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe