Astronauts Sleep Better in Space, a New Study Shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The astronauts returning Wednesday after five months on the International Space Station may miss sleeping in space. According to new research published in the August issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, astronauts sleep more soundly in space than at home on Earth.

Scientists from the University of San Diego, Brigham and Women¿s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and the NASA Ames Research Center studied five healthy astronauts before, during and after space flight to investigate the effects of weightlessness on sleep-disordered breathing. The microgravity of space, they found, resulted in a 55 percent reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)¿a measure of the incidence of temporarily not breathing (apnea) and very shallow, slow breathing (hypopnea). What's more, snoring was essentially eliminated while the subjects were in space, dropping from 17 percent of total sleep time to less than 1 percent. (That's good news, given the confined living quarters of most spacecraft.)

The small study helps quantify the effects of gravity on the respiratory system and related sleep disorders, which are important because gravity acts differently on a person lying down than on someone standing up, the researchers say. "This is the first direct demonstration that gravity plays a dominant role in the generation of apneas, hypopneas and snoring in healthy subjects," the authors conclude.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe