New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Astronomers Discover Youngest Planet Yet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


NASA¿s newest observatory, the Spitzer Space Telescope, has found evidence of what might be the youngest planet yet detected, scientists announced yesterday. "These early results show Spitzer will dramatically expand our understanding of how stars and planets form, which ultimately helps us understand our origins," says project scientist Michael Warner.

Launched in August 2003, Spitzer surveys its galactic surroundings using instruments that detect infrared radiation. The telescope recently observed a star located some 420 light-years away known as CoKu Tau 4 and found a clearing in the dusty disk surrounding it, which could be caused by a planet gathering material as it forms--like a broom sweeping across a dirty floor. This potential planet is less than a million years old--the age of CoKu Tau 4--making it a mere infant compared to our own 4.5-billion-year-old planet.

Spitzer also spied two of the faintest planet-forming disks ever seen in a stellar nursery, 13,700 light-years from Earth. Dubbed RCW 49, the region encompasses some 300 newborn stars. "Preliminary data suggest that all 300 or more stars harbor disks," remarks team member Ed Churchwell of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, "but so far we¿ve only looked closely at two." The additional details that Spitzer can offer about planet-forming disks should provide scientists with a better understanding of how solar systems like ours evolve.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe