New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Astronomers Measure How Fast a Supermassive Black Hole Is Spinning

To do so, they looked to a second black hole orbiting the first

COURTESY OF NASA/JPL/CALTECH

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Black holes may be massive, but they are also extraordinarily compact. That combination of properties makes them challenging regions to evaluate across vast cosmic distances. To learn more about these objects' physical properties, astronomers must therefore come up with measuring tricks. An international team of astronomers recently invented a new one: in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, the members report how to determine a black hole's spin using the interactions of two giant holes bound in mutual orbit.

OJ 287, a binary supermassive black hole system, sits about 3.5 billion light-years from Earth. The duo's primary black hole weighs in at an estimated 18 billion solar masses; the second is a mere 150 million solar masses. Because of this dramatic inequality in size, the smaller hole follows an orbit that punches through a disk of superheated matter swirling around the larger hole. These “outburst” events always occur within a 12-year orbit and are read by astronomers as changes in the system's visible light, which is for the most part produced by the superheated material.

The predictability of this phenomenon and the associated precession, or shifting, of the smaller hole's elliptical orbit helped the astronomers to prepare for two outbursts at OJ 287 in November and December 2015. By precisely measuring the variation in light radiation from the system during those outbursts, the astronomers were able to indirectly measure the spin of the larger black hole. They found that it is spinning at 31 percent of the maximum allowed according to general relativity.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These data, along with earlier observations, clearly indicate that the orbital period is getting shorter with time. That is because the system is losing energy as it emits gravitational waves—ripples in spacetime that steal energy from the holes' orbits, causing them to contract. In other words, in OJ 287 astronomers are witnessing the gradual merging of two supermassive black holes. And as most couples know, outbursts and fast pivots are likely to occur in the run-up to any merger.

Caleb Scharf is director of the Columbia Astrobiology Center and author of several books, including The Copernicus Complex (2014) and The Zoomable Universe (2017). He wrote the Life, Unbounded blog for Scientific American and has written for many other publications. Scharf lives in New York City with his wife and two daughters.

More by Caleb Scharf
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Spin Cycle” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 5 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0516-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe