New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Astronomers Observe the Most Distant Explosion in the Universe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On September 4, astronomers detected a gamma-ray burst from the farthest reaches of the universe, at a time just 900 million years after its birth. The event represents the most distant such explosion ever recorded.

Signifying the death of massive stars, gamma-ray bursts are some of the universe's most powerful explosions. The September 4th burst, dubbed GRB050904, was first detected by NASA's Swift satellite. Scientists subsequently used a number of telescopes around the world to observe it and determined that it has a redshift of 6.29, which translates to a distance of almost 12.6 billion light-years from Earth. "This is uncharted territory," says team member Daniel Reichart, now at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "This burst smashes the old distance record by 500 million light-years. We are finally starting to see the remnants of some of the oldest objects in the universe." Reichart and Don Lamb of the University of Chicago predicted in a 2000 paper in the Astrophysical Journal that such faraway gamma-ray bursts could be detected. At the time, astronomers thought that events beyond a redshift of two or three were unlikely.

The results should help researchers better piece together the events of the early universe, particularly the timeline of the earliest stars. "Gamma-ray bursts are uniquely powerful and probably the only way for a very long time to observe the moment of first light--that redshift when the very first stars formed," Lamb remarks. Indeed, GRB050904 was so energetic that within just a few minutes it released 300 times more energy than the sun will release during its entire lifetime.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe