New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Astronomers Pinpoint Pulsar Location

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Considering that people often have trouble finding their keys in their own homes, it's hardly surprising that astronomers sometimes have difficulty locating objects situated thousands of light-years away from Earth. A pulsar dubbed PSR B0656+14 has proved to be one such elusive object. Now a report published in the August 20 issue of the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters provides the most accurate distance measurement yet for the pulsar and in so doing may help resolve a mystery about cosmic rays.

Previous research had suggested that PSR B0656+14 resided 2,500 light-years away, but the distance was measured only indirectly. Walter Brisken of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and his colleagues used the Very Long Baseline Array of telescopes, which stretches from Hawaii to the U.S. Virgin Islands, to take a more detailed look at PSR B0656+14 between 2000 and 2002. Making a direct measurement, they found that the pulsar is closer than previously thought and sits next to the so-called Monogem Ring, a circular supernova remnant. "Our measurements showed that the pulsar is about 950 light-years from Earth, essentially the same distance as the supernova remnant," says team member Steve Thorsett of the University of California at Santa Cruz. "That means that the two almost certainly were created by the same supernova blast."

The improved coordinates could explain a recently detected surplus of cosmic rays--subatomic particles and atomic nuclei accelerated to close to the speed of light--whose origin was unknown. Brisken notes that "our measurement now puts PSR B0656+14 and the Monogem Ring at exactly the right place and at exactly the right age to be the source of this excess of cosmic rays."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe