Athletes Can Train to Avoid Choking under Pressure

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some sports fans might argue that this year's World Series went to a nail-biting seventh game because Arizona Diamondbacks relief pitcher Byung-Hyun Kim choked, twice. The phenomenon of choking¿performing worse than expected under pressure¿has long plagued professional athletes and performers, but its cause was unclear. Do performers choke because they pay too much attention to their actions or because they get distracted and pay too little attention? Now a report published in the December issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General suggests that it is overattending to a well-learned skill that causes choking.

Sian L Beilock and Thomas H. Carr of the Michigan State University studied golf putting as an example of a task that can suffer under pressure. Fifty-four novice student golfers were trained, under various conditions, to become highly skilled. One group practiced under normal conditions, another group learned to putt while simultaneously performing a distracting secondary task, and the third group was videotaped and told a golf pro would be critiquing their performance, thereby making them feel self-conscious.

After significant practice, the researchers next tested the golfers under high- and low-pressure conditions. The three groups performed similarly on the low-pressure test. Under high pressure, however, the control group and the distraction group both got significantly worse?they choked. But the group forced to practice with a videocamera and the threat of criticism actually improved, the scientists report. "This suggests that adapting to an environment where one is forced to attend to performance from the initial stages of learning," Beilock says, "may provide immunization against the negative effects of performance pressure."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe