Atmospheric Railways

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the article on this subject in the " New Amsrican Cyclopaedia," just publishing, there is considerable information in relation to what has been done in this branch of the engineering art in Europe, but there is nothing said about what has been done in America. This is to be regretted, as considerable information might have been obtained to have redeemed the work from the charge of " an incompetent compilation," and which might have made its character more in accordance with its name, as an American work. If the pages of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN had been consulted, the editors would have found Ira Avery's atmospheric railroad illustrated on page 273, Vol. Ill, for which an American patent was granted in September, 1847; and on page 265, Vol. VIII, they would also have been enlightened with an illustrated description of Richardson's atmospheric tubular railway, which made considerable noise in Congress a few years since on account of appropriations being askejl, for to construct a government line.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 37This article was published with the title “Atmospheric Railways” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 37 (), p. 291
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05221858-291e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe