Atwood and his St. Louis-New York Flight

A Record Full of Promise

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

ONLY a few. years ago, Prof. Simon Newcomb. an authority who was quoted the world over. branded the heavier-than-air flying machine as a mechanical absurdity. I consider the demonstration that no possible combination of known substances, known forms of machines, and known forms of force, can ;Je united fn a practicable machine by which men can fly long distances through the air, as complete as it is possible for the demonstration of any physical fact to be was one of his dicta. He followed it up with the statement: Let us discover a substance a hundred times as strong as steel, and with that some form of force hitherto unsuslected, which will enable us to utilize this strength, or let us discover some way of reversing the law of gravitation, so that matter may be repelled from the earth instead of being attract2d to it, and then, and not till then, we may have a flying machine To drive home his conviction as far as possible, he concluded: There is every reason to believe that mere ingenious advances with our present means and forms of force will be as vain in the fuie as they have been in the past." What would Prof. Newcomb say if he were now alive? What comment would he make on the flight of a young man from St. Louis to Chicago and from Chicago to New York in a machine that did not involve the discovery of new forces or material, in a machine which was as subject to gravitation as a thing of metal and wood and canvas can be? It may be said that Atwood's performance unquestionably proves that the flying machine has a future for swift transportation, when speed is more to l,e considered than cost. Atwood assures us that his

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American