On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The haunting glow of the aurora arises when energized electrons and ions excite gases in the atmosphere. Beams of radio waves can induce auroralike light, but emissions have been too faint to detect with the naked eye. Trying to make the best use of instrument time, Todd R. Pedersen of Hanscom Air Force Base in Massachusetts and Elizabeth A. Gerken of Cornell University trained their radio antennas on a natural aurora event in Alaska. They aimed for a lower than usual region of the atmosphere, about 100 kilometers high, where ions dissipate quickly compared with higher altitudes. For a few minutes last March small green speckles appeared amid the background glow—bright enough in principle to see directly, as the researchers describe in the February 3 Nature. If the effect proves reproducible, Pedersen says, the technique could serve as a tool for atmospheric studies.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
