Autism, OCD and Attention Deficit May Share Brain Markers

All three illnesses linked to glitches in nerve bundle linking brain hemispheres 

CAT scan of brain with Alzheimer’s disease.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Autism shares genetic roots with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) andattention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The three conditions have features in common, such as impulsivity. New findings suggest that they also share a brain signature.

The first comparison of brain architecture across these conditions has found that all are associated with disruptions in the structure of the corpus callosum. The corpus callosum is a bundle of nerve fibers that links the brain’s left and right hemispheres. The results appeared July 1 in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

Clinicians may find it difficult to distinguish autism from ADHD based on symptoms alone. But if the conditions are marked by similar structural problems in the brain, the same interventions might be useful no matter what the diagnosis is, says lead researcher Stephanie Ameis, assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The unique aspects of each condition might arise from other brain attributes, such as differences in the connections between neurons, says Thomas Frazier, director of research at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. “A reasonable conclusion is that autism and ADHD don’t differ dramatically in a structural way, but could differ in connectivity,” says Frazier, who was not involved in the study.

Ameis’ team examined the brains of 71 children with autism, 31 with ADHD, 36 with OCD and 62 typical children using diffusion tensor imaging. This method provides a picture of the brain’s white matter, the long fibers that connect nerve cells, by measuring the diffusion of water across these fibers.

The researchers saw widespread disruptions in white matter structure among children with any of the three conditions. They found fewer alterations in the children with OCD than in those with autism or ADHD, however.

This finding may relate to the early onset of autism and ADHD. Localized white matter disruptions may produce problems associated with OCD later in childhood, Ameis says.

Parents also assessed their children’s attention and social communication skills, obsessive behaviors and ability to perform everyday tasks. Children who showed the least independence on daily tasks have the most significant disruptions in white matter. The researchers found no connection between brain structure and the other behaviors.

“There is an association between what your brain looks like, in terms of its impairment, and how impaired you are in everyday life,” says Ameis.

Tracing tracts:

The researchers also looked for problems in particular white matter tracts. The only tract that looks alike in all three groups is the corpus callosum, suggesting that disruptions of this tract may underlie the features the conditions have in common.

“What’s interesting is that [the corpus callosum] is one of the first tracts to develop and it’s the largest in the brain. So it could be a tract that creates vulnerability for these neurodevelopmental conditions,” Ameis says.

The findings are preliminary, however. The researchers detected changes in only a small section of the corpus callosum, so it isn’t clear whether the aberrations they saw are clinically meaningful, says Ruth Carper, assistant research professor of neurosciences at the University of California, San Diego, who was not involved in the study.

It’s also possible that the differences among the three groups stem from movement in the scanner, a common problem when scanning children with these conditions, Carper says.

Still, researchers say the findings are an initial step toward teasing out the similarities and differences between the three conditions.

This article is reproduced with permission from spectrumnews.org. The article was first published on August 8, 2016. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe