Autism Symptoms Reversed in Mice

Neural 'hyperconnections' caused by runaway protein production can be undone.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Dan Jones

As diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder rise, the need for effective therapies has increased in urgency. Today, a paper in Nature describes two ways of reversing autism-like symptoms in a new mouse model of the condition.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) affects up to 1 in 110 people. Although a few drugs have shown promise in mouse models, none is able to treat the core social deficits common to ASD in humans.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A team of researchers led by Nahum Sonenberg of McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, created a new model of mouse autism, and then reversed its symptoms. They began by genetically engineering mice so that they lacked the gene Eif4ebp2. The 4E-BP2 protein that this produces suppresses the translation of certain messenger RNAs, so knocking out Eif4ebp2 allows the proteins that these mRNAs produce to be synthesized at above normal levels.

Mice lacking Eif4ebp2 exhibit many autism-like symptoms, including poor social interaction, altered communication and repetitive behaviours. Sonenberg and his co-workers found that one group of proteins that proliferates in the absence of Eif4ebp2 is the neuroligins (NLGNs), which sit in the membrane of neurons and help to create and maintain the connections, or synapses, between nerve cells.

When the authors examined mouse brain slices, they discovered that overproduction of NLGNs results in synapses that are prone to overstimulation, establishing a `hyperconnectivity' that many researchers believe underlies the symptoms of ASD.

Although runaway protein synthesis has been implicated in autism before, its downstream effects on synaptic proteins have been opaque, says Jack Price, a developmental neurobiologist at King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry. "This new research helps close that gap, providing a direct link between translation and neuroligins."

Complex solution

Sonenberg and his colleagues also show that the effects of deletingEif4ebp2 can be reversed. Because 4E-BP2 blocks translation by disrupting the protein complex that initiates the process, the researchers tested whether a small-molecule drug that binds to one of the protein components of the translation-initiation complex, preventing complex assembly, would counteract the gene deletion.

This treatment not only reversed synaptic hyperconnectivity, the mice also showed none of the autism-like symptoms that they had exhibited previously. The team extended these findings by directly suppressing the translation of NLGN proteins using short interfering RNAs, and found that this also prevented the development of hyperconnectivity and autism-like symptoms. "Even though autism is a neurodevelopmental disease, we were able to correct autism-associated behaviours in adult mice," says Christos Gkogkas, a member of Sonenberg's team at McGill.

Despite these results, Sonenberg cautions against interpreting them as a sign that a treatment for ASD is around the corner. "The drug we used would be too toxic to use for ASDs," he says. "But we've shown that this pathway is important, identified potential therapeutic targets and demonstrated that a drug therapy is possible in principle."

The search for drug therapies is complicated by the fact that ASD has many genetic causes, each of which accounts for no more than 1% of cases. Nonetheless, Sonenberg says, it's possible that these diverse mutations could converge on the same pathway -- which Price describes as an interesting "unifying hypothesis".

"This is extremely important idea to test," Sonenberg adds, "and it's something we're researching now."

This story is reprinted with permission from Nature magazine. It was first published on November 21, 2012.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe