Babies Learn to Speak

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some theorists believe infants enter the world with “hard-wired” neurons that are preadapted for both understanding and producing speech. Others believe that speech is learned through experience. Now research reveals how a baby’s speech centers function at five days old, then six months, then a year.

Neuroscientist Patricia Kuhl of the University of Washington, working with colleagues at the University of Helsinki in Finland, used a new technique, magnetoencephalography (MEG), to measure brain activity by sensing the magnetic fields neurons create when they fire. The results lend empirical evidence to the notion that speech is indeed learned.

“When we played three kinds of sounds—pure tones, a three-tone harmonic and the Finnish speech sounds PA and BA—for newborns, we saw activity in their auditory centers,” Kuhl says. This means they heard and could distinguish the sounds. “But there was no activity in the inferior frontal cortex,” where speech production is analyzed and mouth and throat muscles are prepared for talking.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By six months, however, the infants were activating this region when they heard either the harmonic or the speech sounds, and the one-year-olds activated both the auditory and speech-production areas simultaneously, indicating “cross-talk between the areas that hear and produce speech,” Kuhl says. Babies, she explains, need time to experiment: to make sounds, listen to them, and link what they hear to what their speech muscles are doing. Once they have figured out this process, they can start listening to and mimicking other speakers.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Babies Learn to Speak” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 5 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1006-10b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe