New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Babies Organize Sight

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By the time they are four months old, most babies can organize visual information in at least three ways: by brightness, by shape and by how close together objects are. Emily Farran, a psychologist at the University of Reading in England, tested infants by showing them images on a computer screen while cameras tracked how long they gazed at various patterns. Her results indicate that perception of brightness emerges first, by two months, in line with previous work. By four months, most infants can group objects by shape and proximity, too. “Earlier research had shown only the ability to group by shape at six to seven months,” Farran says, “and we believe we are the first to show grouping by proximity.”

Farran's interest in the development of visual perception comes from her ongoing research into Williams syndrome. Infants who have the condition have general IQs of about 60, “but their verbal abilities are far superior to their spatial cognition,” she says. Farran is now using the same tests to see how these skills develop in babies and toddlers with Williams syndrome. “Infants are being diagnosed earlier now, thanks in part to a genetic test,” she says, adding that better tracking of abilities during early development could also help doctors understand and counteract perception impairments observed in adults with the syndrome.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Babies Organize Sight” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 4 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0806-9b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe