Babies Organize Sight

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By the time they are four months old, most babies can organize visual information in at least three ways: by brightness, by shape and by how close together objects are. Emily Farran, a psychologist at the University of Reading in England, tested infants by showing them images on a computer screen while cameras tracked how long they gazed at various patterns. Her results indicate that perception of brightness emerges first, by two months, in line with previous work. By four months, most infants can group objects by shape and proximity, too. “Earlier research had shown only the ability to group by shape at six to seven months,” Farran says, “and we believe we are the first to show grouping by proximity.”

Farran's interest in the development of visual perception comes from her ongoing research into Williams syndrome. Infants who have the condition have general IQs of about 60, “but their verbal abilities are far superior to their spatial cognition,” she says. Farran is now using the same tests to see how these skills develop in babies and toddlers with Williams syndrome. “Infants are being diagnosed earlier now, thanks in part to a genetic test,” she says, adding that better tracking of abilities during early development could also help doctors understand and counteract perception impairments observed in adults with the syndrome.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Babies Organize Sight” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 4 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0806-9b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe